In discussing the differences between fully automatic assembly line for stator rotor and manual assembly, it is not difficult to find that the introduction of automation technology has brought far-reaching impact on modern manufacturing industry. The following Vacuz detailed analysis of the differences between the two, and attached to improve the yield of a few suggestions, Vacuz hope to help you!

1. Difference in production efficiency

Fully automated assembly line is known for its efficient automation equipment and intelligent system, which can realize continuous, high-speed assembly operations. This uninterrupted working mode significantly improves production efficiency and easy maintenance. In contrast, manual assembly is limited by the operating speed, proficiency and fatigue of the workers, the efficiency is relatively low, and there are large fluctuations.

2. Quality control differences

In terms of quality control, the fully automatic assembly line realizes the accurate control of the whole process by integrating torque tracing, visual inspection, depth inspection and other advanced technologies. Its high error-proof rate and stability effectively reduce quality problems caused by human factors. Manual assembly, on the other hand, relies more on the experience and skills of workers, and there is a certain degree of uncertainty and subjectivity in quality control.

3. Consideration of labor cost

From the cost point of view, although the fully automated assembly line has a larger initial investment, in the long run, its automation brings efficient production and low error rate can significantly reduce labor costs. On the contrary, manual assembly not only has high labor costs, but also faces problems such as recruitment difficulties and rising costs caused by fluctuations in the labor market.

4.Comparison of Flexibility

In terms of flexibility, both have their own merits. Fully automated assembly line in response to product model change or process adjustment, may require longer preparation time and greater investment, flexibility is relatively low. Manual assembly, on the other hand, can quickly adapt to different production demands and product changes, showing higher flexibility.

Suggestions for improving yield rate:

1. Introduce advanced automation: continue to increase investment in automated equipment and intelligent systems, and utilize their high accuracy, stability and error-proofing to further improve production efficiency and yield rate.

2. Enhance quality control: Establish a perfect quality control system, strengthen testing and tracing during the production process, and ensure that each link meets the quality requirements.

3. Enhance workers’ skills: Although the degree of automation continues to improve, manual operation is still indispensable in some parts of the process. Therefore, the skill training and assessment of workers should be strengthened to improve their operation level and quality awareness.

4. Optimize production process: Through the introduction of advanced management concepts and methods such as lean production, continuously optimize production processes and procedures, reduce waste and unnecessary links, and improve overall production efficiency.

5. Strengthen supply chain management: establish close cooperative relationship with suppliers, strengthen quality control of raw materials and components, and ensure the stability and reliability of the supply chain. At the same time, establish a supplier evaluation and assessment mechanism to promote continuous improvement of suppliers.

In summary, the stator rotor automatic assembly line shows significant advantages in many aspects, through the implementation of a series of effective measures, can further improve the yield rate and meet the market demand.

E-post: sales@vacuz.com