Rotor assembly automation is a trend, and many manufacturers are adopting automated production models. Compared to traditional assembly methods, this not only improves production efficiency but also enhances product quality. So, how does rotor production automation reduce labor costs? What are the requirements for equipment efficiency and stability? Vacuz will briefly introduce this below!
I. Core Strategies for Reducing Labor Costs
1. Equipment Replaces Manual Labor, Reducing Direct Operators
Automated equipment covers the entire process: Robots, AGVs (Automated Guided Vehicles), automated fixtures, and other equipment replace manual labor in tasks such as magnet grinding, gluing, assembly, curing, and unloading.
24-Hour Continuous Production: Automated equipment can operate around the clock, increasing output by 3-5 times per unit time, further reducing labor costs.
2. Optimizing Production Processes, Reducing Ineffective Labor
Multi-Station Parallel Operation: Rotary/linear multi-station turntables are used to simultaneously complete processes such as core insertion, winding, and welding.
Process Reengineering and Intelligent Scheduling: Eliminating redundant steps, converting sequential processes to parallel processes, and dynamically adjusting production plans using the MES system reduces equipment idle time and material waiting time, improving labor efficiency by 40%.
3. Improved Equipment Stability and Reduced Maintenance Costs
Preventative Maintenance and TPM Management: Real-time monitoring of equipment status using vibration/temperature sensors provides 72-hour advance warning of malfunctions. Combined with a TPM (Total Productive Maintenance) model of daily cleaning and regular lubrication, the equipment failure rate is reduced from 5% to 1%, minimizing downtime and resulting in less manpower idleness.
Modular Design for Rapid Changeover: Modular tooling fixtures support rapid changeover within 10 minutes, adapting to diverse production needs and avoiding downtime losses due to product switching, increasing labor utilization by 25%.
4. Data-Driven Management, Reducing Auxiliary Positions
Intelligent Monitoring and Quality Traceability: Integrating machine vision, force control sensors, etc., real-time collection of production data and generation of reports reduces manual record-keeping and quality inspection positions.
Standardized Operations via Process Database: Recording parameters such as winding tension and welding temperature to form Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) reduces quality fluctuations caused by human error and decreases reliance on highly skilled workers.
II. Core Requirements for Equipment Efficiency and Stability
1. Efficiency Requirements: High Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility
High-Speed Motion Control: Servo motors paired with high-precision encoders achieve high-speed positioning; pneumatic-hydraulic booster cylinders shorten pressing time to 1.2 seconds/cycle, increasing single-line efficiency by over 50%.
High-Precision Assembly: The stator and rotor assembly machine must ensure assembly accuracy of ±0.01mm, reducing issues such as uneven air gaps and magnetic flux distortion, and improving motor operating efficiency.
Flexible Production: Modular design supports rapid changeover within 10 minutes, adapting to the needs of multi-variety, small-batch production and avoiding efficiency losses due to product switching.
2. Stability Requirements: Long-Term Reliability and Low Failure Rate
Redundant Design of Core Components: Redundant configurations are adopted for key components such as servo motors and encoders to ensure that single-point failures do not affect overall operation, improving overall equipment efficiency by 30%.
Environmental Adaptability: The equipment must be able to withstand the temperature, humidity, and other environmental conditions of the workshop, and be equipped with leakage protection, overload protection, and other devices to ensure continuous production stability.
Long-Term Stability Verification: Through a 72-hour continuous operation test, the equipment’s failure rate under full load is ensured to be less than 1%, reducing production losses due to downtime.
How can rotor production automation reduce labor costs? What are the requirements for equipment efficiency and stability? Vacuz has provided a brief explanation above, and we hope this information is helpful!